
Dear Readers, I almost can’t believe it, but here I am in the final year of my Open University science course. This year it’s Environmental Science again (after the heavy lifting of biology last year), and a lot of the work will be centred around a project.
We can choose whether to look at food/crop diversity or the ecosystem services provided by trees, so it was pretty much clear which one I’d be looking at – as you might remember, I’m involved with our local Ancient Woodland, and there have been several instances where the economic value of trees has come up against their more intrinsic values. In fact, my personal jury is out on the whole idea of putting a monetary value to something like an oak tree – the calculation usually involves all the things that a tree does for us (sequestering carbon, reducing temperature, absorbing pollution, stabilising soil etc etc) without taking into account things like the trees value to other organisms, or its cultural/aesthetic/social value. Hah! You could argue that we know the price of everything and the value of nothing. However, for some people the only thing they understand is money, so maybe this was inevitable.
To do the calculations, I’ll be using something called Treezilla – from the species of the tree and the circumference of the trunk, it can calculate the rough ecosystem services it provides. This includes Runoff prevented, C02 absorbed, air quality improved and water intercepted. I tried it out with the three trees in my garden, and the largest, a Whitebeam, apparently saves the planet about £43 per year (this would be the cost of humans providing the same services). Well, if some chappie with a chain saw wanted to cut it down, I suspect that £43 wouldn’t be much of a hindrance (though me being chained to the trunk might give him a brief pause for thought).
For my actual project, I’m intending to work out the ecosystem services value of the big trees on the High Road (London plane and lime, largely) and compare them to the range of small trees on my actual road (crab apples, cherries, crape myrtle, hibiscus, rowan and hawthorn). Without wanting to pre-empt the question, I suspect that the ecosystem value of the trees on the High Road will be much higher, even though the biodiversity value of London plane is pretty low compared to a crab apple. The project proposes that we lose all of the trees on either the High Road or the residential street (this is all hypothetical, obviously – in real life you would probably lose some trees from each location, or indeed none at all). In this scenario, although I won’t be sure until I do the calculations, I’m pretty sure that it’s the High Road trees that would stay.
And so, this looks to be an exciting and stimulating year, with lots to think about. Let me know if you have any thoughts so far! I’ll keep you posted on progress.

High Road London Plane

Autumn Colour on Huntingdon Road

















































